初二 散文 8502字 143人浏览 okgxf


These days people pay more attention to artists (writers, painters and so on) and give less importance to science and technology. Do you agree or disagree with this view?

Richness is an important factor in helping people. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Often new commercial centers are planed with respect to green areas and sport facilities. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Why?

Some countries are providing general education in secondary schools, while others are teaching skills specific to a future career. Which type of education would be a better choice these days, in your opinion?

Nowadays some secondary schools give children general education in a range of traditional disciplines, while others claim to be more specialized and pay attention to some particular classes, excluding some general ones. Which of two school types is better for children and why?

Some people argue that the fittest and strongest individuals and teams can achieve the greatest success in sports. But other people think the success is much related to the mental attitude. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people think that children should obey rules or do what their parents and teachers want them to do, but others think that children controlled too much cannot deal with problems well by themselves. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people think that in the modern society individuals are becoming more dependent on each other ,while others say that individuals are becoming more independent of each other. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Individuals and conuntries can not help everyone who need help in the world, so we should be only concerned about our own communities and countries.Agree or Disagree

A family has a great influence on children's development, but the outside of home play a bigger part in children's life. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that advertisements should be banned since they serve no useful purpose and can even be damaging. To what extent do you agree or disagree?


1.it is an indisputable/irrevocable/undeniable/irrefutable fact that

2.I once again reaffirm my position/restate my view that

3.One of the primary benefits/drawbacks associated with this trend is as follows

4.One particular salient example of

5.There are valid arguments to the contrary

6.There are a variety of different perspectives on

7.While some still hold to the conservative view that

8.The disappearance or introduction of ......disrupts/contributes the balance and negatively/positively impact upon

9.In order to stem the tide of

10.There is a widely held perception in many parts of the world that

11.Not a single respondent to the survey rated

12.In stark contrast/by contrast

13.Located at/settle in the apex of

14.More/less affluent countries


16.Prostitution,alcoholism,drug abuse

Model :

I am not quite agree with the author for the reason that we should estimate a great nation with widespread welfare rather than the rest achievements.Even though we need the nation ensure our daily life as a common wealth style to prevent from breaking down;moreover,both physical and social sciences are the material fundament of our community as well as regulations and masterpieces.

To start with,reviewing the forming history of our own,non of all the regime are evolved based on impractical powers;meanwhile if so it would come to inefficient and nonsense.Take the utopia that was concept by Sir Thomas More in 16th centry for example,in which story the author draw a blueprint of a society lying in peace and carefree condition.To be specific,characters lived under a harmony,equal and consummate circumstance there,however ironically due to our selfish,that any of us would be beneficial to ourself lead it to just the reverse .As a matter of fact,this idea could never come true;owing to it is too ideal to be far away from realistic.

On the other hand,we indeed need a welfare for a rainy day to protect stabilize a basic standard in our daily life while we are in dilemma.As we know,when we were at low water ,the elemental feature turning out is life level declining.After that we may fall in problem to live on; as a result of that our community go after a social indemnification system in faith to avoid ignorance of poverty and then let them fade out.Inherently we are innate to behavior so impassive as that;instead,we demand for organizing an emergency frame not to spoil the public but to do a favour when some one is in need.

To draw a conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that I'm not quite accordance with the author's idea.how and what I strongly stand up for is as follows :Initially,our nations all set up on material and mental foundation that is why we have to put emphasis on these.while following up reason is our society as an organism,while we look forward to rules to constructure in a proper way and to conduct us in a moral way.As a double edged sword,with respect to its protection and efficiency the idea is good to us in some extent.To sum up,this conception still has defects and will be controversy in the long run. (389words,节选自GRE ISSUE113 "Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Reason: The surest indicator of a great nation is actually the welfare of all ")

I am not quite in accordance with the author due to the conception that we should learn the same subjects prior to college years.Even though primary and senior courses are highly alike and similar to one another,education is to look upon past achievements after that meditate innovation ways to solve or interpret the problems.

For the reason that everyone could impossibly be uniform,meanwhile different strokes different folks.We persue education for the sake of sculpturing us from different background to apply to variable situations rather than copy and paste labours depend on modals.To unify national curricula is to restrain our adolescent from diversities of maturing so that which perhaps definite as a durance both physically and mentally.We believe in the inherent right that ourselves make options personally and at freedom,in addition actually we based on our factual conditions and interests to make up our mind. Try to reflect on a image as you were forced to filing yourselves into a place out of you capacity, at the same time,where you were definitely not care for .Then repeatedly work on assignments for good,therefore what will you feel about that?

Moving onto next step,during that period we are still not able to make head or tail of what will we do and who will we be etc.In anther way what we make decisions on at present would not represent for what we are going to do either now or future,hence,doing such a job is most likely to mislead us into mass.In our childhood our mind always exhale upon the air,since that we may have a big deal of ideal life style to realize.Despite of some of them are seldomly liable to bring into effect,we should preserve all of them instead of break them down.Furthermore even the adult could transfer savour into other aspects as well,for instance,what we call it today job hopping.

Although according to what I said above,unify of national curriculum is never tne less beneficial to us.Take the education system as a whole for example,the unification results in itself convenient for government and school to supervisor and operate.Separated courses may lead us to be at a loss to measure or comment on what we have achieved.What's more,otherwise we may divide our limited materials and energy in superfluous items as to have negative influence on necessary academic activities such as reducing obligato fees and so forth.

In a nutshell, I once again reaffirm my position that I'm not quite agree with the author's idea.how and what I strongly stand up for is as follows :Initially,our genus set us up to take different tasks so that this is the innate and natural power to choose which field we will be in,while following up reason is we haven't been crystal clear aware of what we will do as well as what we think of could not stand for what we do.As a double edged sword,with respect to its convenience and standard the idea is good to us in some way.To sum up,this conception still has defects and will be controversy in the long term.(510 words,节选自GRE ISSUE6“A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.”)